dr-WONG
Monday, July 16, 2007
「 sunset on 9:57 pm 」
ok. i dont think my blog is really colourful with photos (like !SABRINA's), so i shall decorate it with 2 photos today! :D

16 July (MON)
bridging today after skl.
yes. BRIDGE-ing.
while the CL ppl are waiting for their LC to start, we played bridge in class.
bridging is our kls' favourite pastime.
or in fact, the boys'.
ok. better not talk any more. dont want any teachers to find out =X


after that, went CGH to collect the CIP letter with peter. so pek chek. reached the 'Friends of CGH' room at 2.05pm, to find out that they close at 2pm. so slack! the community service coordinator worked weekdays from 10am to 2pm.. it's just like the working hours of a DJ in a radio station..!



ok.. reached home at abt 2.45pm. immediately tuned into symphony 92.4fm to listen to the CL O Level LC to laugh at the questions. i dont know how much i scored last year, but i just know that i got overall A1! CL ppl, jiayou! the papers are not difficult if you make an effort to practise your comprehension and composition before the paper. and yes, dont be zi bei just because cannot minus 2 pts because didnt take HCL.

and i did a lame thing. record down the 30-minute broadcast. maybe next time then upload (if it is allowed)..


the SEL rubic thingy is killing me. supposed to grade 15 ppl's level of 'SOCAL EMOTIONS'. =D the questions are so 'guai lan' and difficult to answer. like sense of purpose of achievement.
lvl 1: learning is just studying. lvl 2: learning/studying is for a good future. lvl 3: learning is more than study. lvl 4: understand learning is life-long.


how do i know how do the sec ones think? i've been only around with them for 6 months, or abt 180 days to sound longer. even if i were with them for longer, i may not be able to know their attitudes and feelings. i can safely say that even guo dong cant understand the sec threes' attitudes completely. how do we grade? what can we grade them upon? i must say, most of these things are actually hidden.

i was thinking, if this rubic is giving me so much trouble, then how will mr (jimmy) tan grade them? i dont event think he can recognise all of them.
another trouble.. how do i grade those who didnt come but are still registered under 'SCOUTS'. i dont know.. it's highly impossible that after just a few days with him, i can detect his emotions well.

this is what i graded one of them:





basically it's all 1s and 2s for the first page. it's not a biased/prejudiced viewpoint, but i i'm left with no other choice. there is a question about loyalty. "lvl 1: do not see the point and do not attend or support certain class, CCA and school activities/events... ... " it's obvious what to put.

in fact, this thing can be very subjective. some ppl think he's this, others think he's that. that's why this rubic is highly inaccurate and actually, to an extent, not useful as a source to detect a person's social emotions.


however it is useful, as shown in the source below:



this is a person who i think is good in all aspects except relationship management. he may be enthusiastic, but frm what i can see (in the short 6 mths), he's definitely not good in managing relationships. what i just hope is that when he receives his HOLISTIC report card, he can reflect on it and work on the areas he's weak in.

Labels: